See Related Papers and Related Projects:
Semantic Meaning & Analysis ·
AI Modeling Thought & Language ·
AI Affective Virtual Human ·
XR Avatars; Edu, Coaches, Health ·
Sensing Humans (Bio/Brain/Face/Movement/VR)
Researchers: Steve DiPaola, Vanessa Utz, Rafael Arias Gonzalez
Steve DiPaola, Dir.· iVizLab · Simon Fraser University
A Community Answer to Corporate AI
The Problem
Current corporate AI systems present fundamental challenges to our society. They send private data to corporate servers with no transparency or user control. They hide behind subscription walls that price out students, non-profits, Indigenous communities, and cultural organizations. They consume enormous amounts of energy at a scale that meaningfully harms the climate. And they were built on biased, Western-dominated datasets filled with copyrighted and culturally sensitive material taken without consent or attribution.
Perhaps less discussed but equally serious: these systems are actively misidentifying and homogenizing cultural and aesthetic distinctions. A graduate student in our lab studying Chinese art conservation fed traditional Chinese scroll paintings into a leading commercial model and received output influenced by modern Japanese aesthetics. This is not a minor error. It reflects a systematic cultural bias baked into these systems at the data level — one that especially harms Indigenous traditions, non-Western cultures, and communities whose knowledge and creative practice have been misrepresented or erased.
At the iVizLab research lab (DiPaola, Dir. ) at Simon Fraser University, we believe AI should not be an oracle controlled by a few. It should be a transparent, sustainable medium for human creativity. Supported by different funding, including a major five-year SSHRC Insight Grant (2026–2030), we are building a full-stack ethical AI alternative.
Our initiative consists of two interconnected open-source projects: ai4all, our text and knowledge layer, and RethinkAI, our visual and creative layer.
Shared Principles
Both projects are grounded in the same two commitments.
We are moving away from what we call the "you prompt, AI produces" trap. Passive prompting leads to what we describe as cognitive atrophy: the gradual erosion of reasoning, questioning, synthesis, and reflection in the people using these tools. Real professional and creative work is never one-shot. Our systems are built for active orchestration instead. The human decomposes the problem, directs specific steps, verifies outputs, and decides how to move forward. You are the conductor. AI executes a part. You verify, fork, reflect, and continue.
Generative AI has a large and largely hidden environmental cost. A single query to GPT-5 consumes an estimated 20–50 watt-hours. Our locally-run models average around 0.13 watt-hours per query, roughly 70% less. Both of our tools include a real-time energy dashboard so users can see the actual environmental cost of every session. Our own user studies show that when people can see this information, they change their behavior: they submit fewer prompts, they think before they query, and they engage more deliberately. Visibility changes practice.
Two Projects — One Unified Mission
Project 1
ai4all
The Knowledge Layer — LLM / Text AI
A fully open-source, locally-run AI system. Free, private, no cloud, no subscription. Runs on your Mac or PC. Designed for deliberate, human-led use.
Status: v4.0 deployed
Students · educators · non-profits · Indigenous groups · cultural institutions
Project 2
RethinkAI
The Creative Layer — Visual / Image AI
A new visual generative model built from ethically sourced data, with culturally grounded captioning and a Creative Journey interface that puts artists in control.
Funding: Large 5 year SSHRC Insight Grant
Artists · designers · cultural institutions · Indigenous communities
Project 1
ai4all is a fully open-source, locally-run large language model system designed to democratize access to AI for knowledge work and reduce the digital divide.
Project 2
Funded by a Large 5 year SSHRC Insight Grant, RethinkAI fundamentally reorients visual generative AI to protect and empower artists and cultural communities rather than displace them.
The problem with current visual AI models runs deep. They were trained on copyrighted and culturally sensitive works without attribution or consent. Their captioning systems misidentify and flatten cultural, historical, and aesthetic distinctions in ways that are not incidental but structural. Indigenous and non-Western artistic traditions are especially harmed. And the dominant prompt-and-produce model displaces artists from their own creative process rather than supporting it.
We are fixing this from the ground up across three objectives.
We are building a new visual generative model trained exclusively on pre-1932 public domain artworks and design works, which are both legally clean and fully documented. Every source, artist, and image in the system will be publicly searchable. Provenance is not an afterthought: it is a design requirement.
We are developing a semantic captioning system built in collaboration with Indigenous communities, Asian cultural experts, dance practitioners, designers, and others. The goal is captions that capture technical execution, stylistic nuance, and cultural specificity rather than erasing it. We are actively seeking faculty collaborators and domain experts to help build this framework across traditions.
Artists do not prompt in the real world. They journey through a creative space: exploring, backtracking, forking, discovering. Our interface maps every creative decision the artist makes and makes that map visible and navigable. You can move forward through a creative session, return to an earlier branch, fork in a new direction, and see the full territory of your own creative process. Session-specific model personalization adapts to the artist's emerging direction. The energy dashboard is integrated throughout.
Who We Are
The iVizLab team at SFU is embedded in the communities we serve. We build working prototypes and deploy them in real creative and professional contexts: gallery shows, Chinese scroll conservation, dance and movement research, medical education, architectural ideation, and animal communication studies. We continuously refine our tools based on genuine creative and community needs, not just controlled lab conditions.
We have five published or submitted papers on this work, including contributions to AIES 2026, ICML 2026, IJCAI, and ICCC 2023, covering energy consumption, slow AI design principles, the concept of AI slag as distinct from AI slop, and culturally grounded generative systems.
Get Involved
We are actively seeking collaborators, community partners, and early users. If your organization works in arts, culture, education, Indigenous knowledge, or community services, we want to hear from you.
"AI should not be an oracle controlled by a few. It should be a transparent, sustainable medium for human creativity."
Contact Us ivizlab.sfu.ca